Under what circumstances should you assume that pesticide exposure has occurred?

Assuming that pesticide exposure has occurred when there are signs of exposure or if the pesticide was spilled is based on fundamental safety and health principles in pesticide handling. Signs of exposure can include symptoms such as skin irritation, respiratory distress, or acute effects that manifest visibly. Furthermore, a spill indicates that the pesticide has likely come into contact with a surface, person, or environment where it poses a risk of exposure.

It's crucial to be proactive in situations where exposure is possible to ensure the safety of those in the vicinity. This is especially true in cases of spills, as the materials might become airborne or contact skin, necessitating immediate response measures to mitigate potential health risks.

In contrast, assuming exposure solely based on one symptom such as nausea could lead to missed opportunities for early intervention when other signs are present. Similarly, windy conditions may not directly correlate with exposure unless there's physical evidence of drift, and a damaged container implies potential risk but may not confirm that exposure has occurred without additional evidence. Thus, considering multiple indicators as a basis for assuming exposure promotes a more comprehensive and cautious approach to handling pesticide-related situations.