Which practice can help reduce the risk of pesticide resistance?

Prepare for the Wisconsin Pesticide Applicator Turf and Landscape Exam with our extensive study materials. Master multiple choice questions and gain valuable hints and explanations. Boost your confidence and ace your exam!

Employing a variety of control methods is an effective practice for reducing the risk of pesticide resistance. This approach, often referred to as integrated pest management (IPM), involves combining different strategies such as cultural practices, biological controls, and chemical applications. By using multiple methods, pests are less likely to adapt to a single control measure. When reliance is placed solely on one type of pesticide, there is a greater chance that pests will develop resistance over time.

In contrast, using the same pesticide repeatedly can lead to a buildup of pest populations that are resistant to that specific chemical. Additionally, applying pesticides during low pest populations is not a robust method for resistance management, as it does not address the underlying risk factors that contribute to resistance development. Minimizing changes in application techniques may limit effectiveness against varying pest populations and can inadvertently increase the potential for resistance if the methods become predictable to the pests. Hence, adopting a diverse set of control measures mitigates the risk of resistance and promotes sustainability in pest management practices.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy